diff 21759e1..bfa87cd kadison_kaplansky_projection_counter_v2.txt
diff --git a/kadison_kaplansky_projection_counter_v2.txt b/kadison_kaplansky_projection_counter_v2.txt
index 286e5e7..17f6884 100644
--- a/kadison_kaplansky_projection_counter_v2.txt
+++ b/kadison_kaplansky_projection_counter_v2.txt
@@ -747,10 +747,16 @@ number, bucket, x).
UNIQUE LONG PATHS. If two nonbacktracking paths of length at
least L_i end or begin at a vertex in layer i, and they read the
same oriented word in a fixed finite alphabet, they coincide as
-paths. Reason: the triangular equations propagate bit by bit,
-and the block recovery above covers the first half of the path;
-the gated structure past the end lets the remaining bits be read
-off.
+paths. Reason in one line: the triangular equations of 6.4
+propagate bit by bit along the common word, and the "gate" data
+included in each label records the block state sufficiently far
+back that a wrong start cannot reproduce the word.
+
+The full proof of this is deferred to the pruning section of
+6.7 (the "prefix-recovery" lemma), where the gated deletion
+rule and the two-layer comparison are laid out. Nothing
+in 6.5 is used later except the conclusion; the machinery lives
+in 6.7.
6.6 THE TWO GRAPHS Y^0 AND Y^#.
@@ -1533,7 +1539,7 @@ lemma.
We want a FINITE list of coefficient templates, uniform in the
layer index. Two replacements make this possible.
-COMPACT SUPPORT. Lemma nil:templates (Part 7) says: J_epsilon
+COMPACT SUPPORT. the compactness result of Part 7 (Part 7) says: J_epsilon
can be replaced by compactly supported smooth J_epsilon^flat at
arbitrarily small L^1 coefficient cost, uniformly in the
lattice mesh, for small enough ell.
@@ -1880,22 +1886,42 @@ cancellations actual, and the remaining nonempty cyclic path
would contradict the girth hypothesis (2^C_* = 10^4 > 5000).
So each bounded face has at least 20 arcs.
-EULER COUNT. Let b be the number of arcs and M_mark be the
-number of marked vertices. A plane Euler formula b = v + J - 1
-with each unmarked vertex of degree >= 3 gives
+EULER COUNT. Write v for the number of vertices (marked plus
+unmarked) and b for the number of arcs. Plane Euler gives
+v - b + (J + 1) = 2, i.e. b = v + J - 1. Count the ends of
+every arc in two ways. Each arc has two ends, so the sum of
+all face lengths is 2b; only bounded faces are counted, and
+each has at least 20 arcs by FACE CYCLE, so 20J <= 2b. Each
+unmarked vertex has degree at least 3 after suppression by
+(R3), so summing degrees over unmarked vertices gives
+3(v - M_mark) <= 2b. Substituting v = b - J + 1:
- 20 J <= 2 b, b <= 3 J + 3 M_mark - 3,
- b <= 6 M_mark.
+ 3(b - J + 1 - M_mark) <= 2b, so
+ b <= 3 J + 3 M_mark - 3.
-INJECTIVITY. Take an injectivity failure with M_mark = 1.
-The two inequalities 20J <= 2b and b <= 6 give
+Combine this with 20J <= 2b (i.e. 10J <= b):
- 20 J <= 6 J, so J = 0.
+ 10 J <= b <= 3 J + 3 M_mark - 3, so
+ 7 J <= 3 M_mark - 3.
-The diagram is a tree, its exterior word is freely trivial. A
-path with freely-trivial word in a folded graph returns to its
-source. That contradicts the chosen injectivity failure (the
-endpoints were supposed distinct).
+Therefore J <= (3 M_mark - 3)/7 and
+b <= 3 J + 3 M_mark - 3 <= (30/7) M_mark < 6 M_mark.
+
+INJECTIVITY. Take an injectivity failure with M_mark = 1.
+The bound b <= 3 J + 3 M_mark - 3 becomes b <= 3 J, and
+10 J <= b then forces 10 J <= 3 J, hence J = 0.
+
+The diagram is therefore a single tree, and its exterior word
+(= the source path between the two distinct source vertices)
+is freely trivial, because there are no bounded faces to read
+relators from. In the folded graph Y, a nonbacktracking path
+has a freely reduced word: two consecutive labels s, t satisfy
+s != t^{-1}, since otherwise the second edge would be the
+unique edge at that vertex with label t, forcing it to be the
+reverse of the first edge, a backtrack. A freely reduced word
+can only be freely trivial if it is empty. So the source path
+is empty, meaning its endpoints coincide; that contradicts the
+chosen injectivity failure (they were assumed distinct).
Consequently every component map phi is injective, and the same
argument applied to edges handles the edge case. Since phi is
@@ -2415,7 +2441,7 @@ remove; the same bound is valid.
WEIGHTED TRACE BOUND. Fix t in (0, delta). Write tr_id for the
identity trace of 10.3 (sum over base and matrix indices, or over
its central Fourier fiber; the countable amplification is handled
-by Lemma nil:trace). Since P_i and E_P(t) are equivariant, the
+by the adjoint-square identity-trace lemma of Part 7). Since P_i and E_P(t) are equivariant, the
adjoint-square identity and positivity give
tr_id(P_i E_P(t) P_i)
@@ -2506,8 +2532,8 @@ tr_{C^N}( E_Q(u, u) ) = e_{type(u)}
for every u in Q, where type(u) is the base vertex under the
embedding Q -> X. A lift u of the base vertex v lies over the
same layer as v: the layer is preserved by the graph embedding.
-The weight estimate of Part 9 (geo:weight) says that for every
-vertex u of B(Q) over layer i = layer(u), the whole ball satisfies
+The weight estimate of Part 9 says that when the ball B(Q)
+lies over layer i, its whole vertex set satisfies
|V(B(Q))| <= w_i = 2^{C_bullet H_i}.