diff 763cb89..d0ef47e spherical_perceptron_bi_orthogonal_v2.txt
diff --git a/spherical_perceptron_bi_orthogonal_v2.txt b/spherical_perceptron_bi_orthogonal_v2.txt
index cc15e29..8b6dbb3 100644
--- a/spherical_perceptron_bi_orthogonal_v2.txt
+++ b/spherical_perceptron_bi_orthogonal_v2.txt
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ potentials with independent Gaussian patterns; the rigorous theorems
concern the performance of approximate-message-passing algorithms.
These papers predict an overlap hierarchy beyond the regime described
by a single scalar order parameter. The variational formula retains this hierarchy as a matrix-valued overlap path.
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-gyorgyi-reimann-0003360.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-2406.02970v3.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-gyorgyi-reimann-0003360.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-2406.02970v3.pdf
Prescribed singular spectra and independent Haar singular bases already
appear in Kabashima's framework for inference from correlated patterns
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ Rademacher complexity. These are direct predecessors of the spectral
model just described. A full matrix-path variational problem
delivers a limiting pressure for bounded continuous potentials with
compact limiting singular spectrum and no outliers.
-./pdf/refs/kabashima-2008.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-panchenko-vector.pdf
-./pdf/refs/abbara-et-al-2020-pmlr.pdf
+./pdf/kabashima-2008.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-panchenko-vector.pdf
+./pdf/abbara-et-al-2020-pmlr.pdf
Two obstructions separate the Gaussian perceptron calculation from the
present model. First, fixing the singular values makes the matrix
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ compact groups $U(N)$, $O(N)$ and $USp(2N)$ with probability
distributions given by the respective invariant measures" and the
algorithm is "straightforward to implement using standard linear
algebra packages." Only the $O(N)$ case is needed.
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-mezzadri-0609050.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-mezzadri-0609050.pdf
The remaining Gaussian problem involves several Stiefel columns, with
one column shared at an intermediate level of a cascade. Its upper
@@ -104,11 +104,11 @@ the number of patterns and the field parameters are matrix covariance
increments on the active Stiefel coordinates. The
proof establishes the corresponding contact identities while
retaining the prescribed sharing of one coordinate.
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-2004.01679v8.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-2010.09114v2.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-1906.08471v2.pdf
-./pdf/refs/mourrat-panchenko-2020.pdf
-./pdf/refs/aizenman-sims-starr-2003-cond-mat-0306386.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-2004.01679v8.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-2010.09114v2.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-1906.08471v2.pdf
+./pdf/mourrat-panchenko-2020.pdf
+./pdf/aizenman-sims-starr-2003-cond-mat-0306386.pdf
The matrix overlap argument draws on Panchenko's vector-spin
synchronisation theory and its enriched formulation in Mourrat's
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ appear in Ko's paper on the Crisanti-Sommers formula for vector spins,
and the scalar spherical cascade transform is computed by Mourrat. The
entropy includes the change of active spin space at the sharing
level, which the scalar formula does not cover.
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-panchenko-vector.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-1911.04355.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-panchenko-vector.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-1911.04355.pdf
The probabilistic framework is the cascade and overlap theory of spin
glasses. Ruelle introduced the probability cascades that generate the
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ enter where the matrix symmetry of the overlap is proved. The argument
keeps an independent residual Gaussian noise on every visit
to a cascade leaf and verifies the marking rules for the fractional
moments and zero restrictions. ./refs/ghirlanda-guerra-1998.pdf
-./pdf/refs/panchenko-2013.pdf
+./pdf/panchenko-2013.pdf
The singular values of $A$ describe the strength and rank of the
measurements. Write $s_{N,1}\ge\cdots\ge s_{N,r_N}$ for the singular
@@ -412,11 +412,11 @@ The required form of the ultrametric summary is the version proved by
Panchenko for vector spins and for the Potts spin glass, together
with the marked-cascade rules of Panchenko-Talagrand and Bolthausen-
Sznitman.
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-panchenko-vector.pdf
-./pdf/refs/panchenko-2013.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-1512.00370v3.pdf
-./pdf/refs/mourrat-panchenko-2020.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-2004.01679v8.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-panchenko-vector.pdf
+./pdf/panchenko-2013.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-1512.00370v3.pdf
+./pdf/mourrat-panchenko-2020.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-2004.01679v8.pdf
Matrix quantiles. Dense first-power quadratic forms determine each
matrix once symmetry is known. Dense quadratic forms therefore give
@@ -569,9 +569,9 @@ this trial, uniformly in $q$; taking the infimum over $q$ gives the
theorem. The comparison follows Mourrat's supersolution method for
mean-field spin glasses with vector spins, adapted to the
nonlinear pattern Hamiltonian.
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-2004.01679v8.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-2010.09114v2.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-1906.08471v2.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-2004.01679v8.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-2010.09114v2.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-1906.08471v2.pdf
Enrich the model. Add independent linear Gaussian fields with
covariance levels tied to $q$. Replace the deterministic pattern
@@ -684,8 +684,8 @@ $M+\ell$ for a fixed cavity size $\ell$ large compared to $1$ and tiny
compared to $M$. Compare the enlarged pressure with the base $M$
pressure on the same disorder, using two restored patterns per
increment.
-./pdf/refs/aizenman-sims-starr-2003-cond-mat-0306386.pdf
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-2311.08980v3.pdf
+./pdf/aizenman-sims-starr-2003-cond-mat-0306386.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-2311.08980v3.pdf
The cascade with only the outer split at $\theta$ and the same
monomial perturbations (amplitude $s_M=M^{3/8}$) replaces the
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ probability at most $(C\epsilon)^M$. Take a fixed mesh for the upper
bound and a mesh of order $\epsilon$ for the lower bound; the strict
inequality $n/M\to p<1$ makes the small-ball exponent dominate the
net size.
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-mezzadri-0609050.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-mezzadri-0609050.pdf
The volume Jacobian of $x\mapsto Gx$ on the coefficient sphere is
$\sqrt{\det(G^TG)}$. Its logarithm divided by $M$ converges in
@@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ concentrate about the prescribed fractions; the failure bound is
uniform in the fixed vector. Simultaneous concentration for all shell
vectors is unnecessary. Thus each such vector lies in a slightly
enlarged new $a$-shell with failure probability $\epsilon_M\to 0$.
-./pdf/refs/arxiv-1911.01061v5.pdf
+./pdf/arxiv-1911.01061v5.pdf
Angular identity. Radial integration and Stirling's formula show that
the weighted Lebesgue volume in $E_1\oplus\cdots\oplus E_h$ of a small
@@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ singular slots, not on output eigenvalues. The uniform lower bound
$\inf_u Q(u)\ge 1/80$ is a Kashin-type spreading estimate for Haar
frames; a norm-comparison restatement in the lasso analysis of Bayati
and Montanari gives the same conclusion with explicit constants.
-./pdf/refs/bayati-montanari-lasso.pdf
+./pdf/bayati-montanari-lasso.pdf
Counterexample: unbounded limiting spectrum. Let $d_k=\exp(8^k)$ and
$\nu=\sum_{k\ge 1}2^{-k}\delta_{d_k}$ with unbounded support. For